Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Sony Xperia XZs, with a 92.9 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's design is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia XZs's, although it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and Sony Xperia XZs both have extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite worse pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. The Sony Xperia XZs takes slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a much smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, a lot lower 19 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a tinier aperture and a worse 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior memory for apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 55% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.