Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than the Xperia XZs, with an 88.1 score against 77.2. Even though Galaxy F62 is incredibly newer than Xperia XZs, it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy F62 has a bit superior processing unit than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit sharper display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. The Sony Xperia XZs has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F62, although it has a much lower 19 MP resolution camera, a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a tinier aperture and a much tinier back camera sensor shooting much lower quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy F62 has a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.