Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZs's general score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also way heavier than the Sony Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Sony Xperia XZs features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel density. Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with higher 960 frames per second video frame rate, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy Fold features a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than Xperia XZs, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.