Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.87 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Sony Xperia XZs, getting a overall score of 78.9 against 77.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M20 is newer than the Sony Xperia XZs, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. The Sony Xperia XZs features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy M20 features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xperia XZs features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M20, although it has less cpu cores (but faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Xperia XZs takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy M20 has a superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.