Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Xperia XZs, having a general score of 90.8 against 77.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is extremely newer than the Xperia XZs, it's heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a display that's just as good as the Xperia XZs one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xperia XZs features a way better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia XZs also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and better 960 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 48% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more than the Xperia XZs, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.