Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Sony Xperia XZs, getting a general score of 93.6 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is noticeably newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia XZs. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a bigger screen, a just a little higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. Sony Xperia XZs has a way better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with better video frame rate, a much more mega pixels camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 5G has a superior battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.