Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than the Sony Xperia XZs's overall score of 77.2. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia XZs's, although it's much heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little sharper screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution, a much larger screen and a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2900mAh. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Xperia XZs, because it has a way higher video definition, a camera with much more MP, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more money than Xperia XZs, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.