Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-05 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is extremely thinner and much lighter than the Xperia XZs. The Sony Xperia XZs features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (but faster).
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Xperia XZs, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little greater screen density and a way bigger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures, a lot higher video quality, a way larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.