Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 score. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is noticeably newer than the Sony Xperia XZs, it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. Galaxy XCover Pro and Sony Xperia XZs count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more processing cores. The Sony Xperia XZs shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much lower 19 MP resolution camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.