Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Sony Xperia XZs's, although it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a just a little greater display density, a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZs takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with faster 960 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit longer battery life than Xperia XZs, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the Xperia XZs, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.