Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a global score of 92.3, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZs's overall score of 77.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is notably newer and thinner than Sony Xperia XZs's, but it's also heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 4 more cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Xperia XZs, because it has a bigger display, a bit greater pixel count in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a little better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. Xperia XZs shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with better 960 fps video frame rates, a much more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Xperia XZs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.