Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Xperia XZs, with a 94.6 score against 77.2. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a way newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Xperia XZs, although it is also notably heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xperia XZs both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a way bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution. Sony Xperia XZs counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video and a much tinier sensor taking much worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with faster video frame rates and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 55% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the Xperia XZs, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.