Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 12.87 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than Xperia XZs, getting a 90.6 score against 77.2. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is incredibly newer and extremely thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and 8 GB more RAM.
The Xperia XZs has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density. Sony Xperia XZs has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.