Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-05 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a bit better than Xperia XZs, having a general score of 82.7 against 77.2. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a lot newer than Xperia XZs, it's a bit thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has more storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Xperia XZs captures clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, a camera in the back with lot less megapixels and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.