Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZs's 77.2 overall score. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way newer than Sony Xperia XZs, it is notably heavier and just a bit thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZs features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. Sony Xperia XZs features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a lot tinier camera sensor, a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xperia XZs, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 73 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.