Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is much better than Xperia Z2's overall score of 72.9. The Google Pixel 4 design has the same thickness than the Xperia Z2, but it's just a bit lighter. The Xperia Z2 has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little inferior pixels number per display inch and a little smaller display.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Google Pixel 4 has a superior camera than Xperia Z2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a worse image quality, a back camera with a much worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Google Pixel 4 has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia Z2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. The Xperia Z2 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.