Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-02-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is much better than Xperia Z2's general score of 72.9. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4, so it gives you some extra features. The LG V30S ThinQ is a incredibly newer device, and it is also just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xperia Z2.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). Xperia Z2 counts with a slightly better display than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity per inch in the screen, a bit smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more memory for games and applications than Xperia Z2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 112 GB more internal memory. The LG V30S ThinQ takes better photos and videos than Xperia Z2, because although it has a much tinier sensor which provides a lot worse image and video quality, a lower (4K) video definition and a back camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ is way more expensive than the Xperia Z2, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.