Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than Sony Xperia Z2, with an 81.3 score against 72.9. The LG V35 ThinQ body is notably newer, just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Sony Xperia Z2. Xperia Z2 has a bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a just a little lower pixels number in each inch of screen.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia Z2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better battery duration than Xperia Z2, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has a camera with a much worse 16 megapixels resolution, a lot smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.