Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Xperia Z2, having an 87.1 score against 72.9. Although LG Velvet is just a little heavier than Xperia Z2, it's just a little bit thinner and also newer. LG Velvet features a bit better hardware performance than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Xperia Z2 has a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG Velvet features longer battery performance than Xperia Z2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality pictures.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.