Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-02-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is a little bit better than Xperia Z2, with a 75.8 score against 72.9. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4, providing the user a lot of extra features. Moto Z Force is a thinner phone than the Xperia Z2, but they weight 5.75oz.
Sony Xperia Z2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z2 also counts with a graphics processing unit. Sony Xperia Z2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a quite smaller display and a just a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a much better camera than Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a back camera with more megapixels and a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force has just a bit better battery performance than Xperia Z2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Moto Z Force is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.