Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Xperia Z2, having an 80 score against 72.9. Although the Motorola One Zoom is incredibly newer than Xperia Z2, it is heavier and a little thicker. Xperia Z2 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Xperia Z2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola One Zoom takes much better videos and photos than Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola One Zoom counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z2, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom counts with longer battery performance than Xperia Z2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola One Zoom is also cheaper than the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.