Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-02-24 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than the Xperia Z2, getting a 76.4 score against 72.9. The Nokia 9 PureView construction is much newer and just a little bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Xperia Z2. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Xperia Z2 counts with just a bit better screen than Nokia 9 PureView, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a bit smaller screen and a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better camera than Xperia Z2, because although it has a worse video resolution, a way less mega pixels camera and a tinier back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
Nokia 9 PureView features much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z2, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is more expensive than Xperia Z2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia Z2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia Z2, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.