Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Xperia Z2, getting a global score of 91.3 against 72.9. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is incredibly newer than Xperia Z2, it's heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Sony Xperia Z2 and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G feature really similar processors, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores (although slower) and 3 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia Z2 has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z2, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A52 5G features a way better camera than Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera with a lot higher resolution, a much larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.