Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a lot better than Xperia Z2's 72.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52s is notably newer than the Xperia Z2, it is heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Xperia Z2 features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z2, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s has a little bit better performance than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Galaxy A52s features a way better camera than Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video, a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A52s has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia Z2, because it has a 41% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.