Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Sony Xperia Z2, having a 97.6 score against 72.9. Galaxy Fold's construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Sony Xperia Z2's, although it's also a lot heavier. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Sony Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4, so it counts with some extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Xperia Z2 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior camera than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, a much lower resolution back facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments.
Galaxy Fold features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the Xperia Z2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.