Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Xperia Z2, with a 98.9 score against 72.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much heavier phone than Xperia Z2, but they have the same thickness. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better hardware performance than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Sony Xperia Z2 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit inferior pixel number per inch in the screen, a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia Z2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Xperia Z2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Xperia Z2, because it has a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a way higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Sony Xperia Z2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.