Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Sony Xperia Z2, having a 98 score against 72.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia Z2's, but it is just a bit thicker and notably heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Sony Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features just a little better performance than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Xperia Z2 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, a much smaller display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Xperia Z2, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with much more MP, a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Xperia Z2, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than Xperia Z2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.