Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Xperia Z2, having a general score of 88.5 against 72.9. Galaxy Z Flip is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner phone than Xperia Z2, but it's heavier. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4.
The Xperia Z2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a lot smaller display, a just a little worse pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster processor than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better camera than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the Xperia Z2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.