Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than the Sony Xperia Z2's 72.9 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the Sony Xperia Z2's, although it is also somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Sony Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Xperia Z2 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a lot smaller display and a little inferior amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has a camera with a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution, a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs more than the Xperia Z2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.