Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Xperia Z2, with a 94.6 score against 72.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is extremely newer and thinner than the Xperia Z2's, although it's much heavier. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4.
The Sony Xperia Z2 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia Z2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processing unit than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better battery duration than Xperia Z2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than the Xperia Z2, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.