Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-24 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blasting black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 690 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a lot better than Xperia Z2, with a 90.1 score against 72.9. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a way newer device than Xperia Z2, although it is noticeably thicker and extremely heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Xperia Z2 has Android 4.4.4.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Xperia Z2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xperia Z2 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a bit less pixels per inch of display and a way smaller screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way better camera than Xperia Z2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a lot larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z2, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.