Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.34 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 440.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 880 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a global score of 77.9, which is a bit better than Xperia Z3 Compact's 70.9 global score. LG Q70's construction is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner than Xperia Z3 Compact's, but it is also notably heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Q70 has the newer 10 version while Xperia Z3 Compact has Android 4.4, giving you some nice extra features.
Xperia Z3 Compact features a slightly better looking display than LG Q70, although it has a much smaller screen, a bit inferior pixel number per inch of display and a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Xperia Z3 Compact counts with a little faster processor than LG Q70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor.
LG Q70 shoots greater pictures and videos than Xperia Z3 Compact, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations.
The LG Q70 has a much better storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z3 Compact, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 counts with a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia Z3 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
LG Q70 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.