Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 880 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the Xperia Z3 Compact's 70.9 overall score. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a extremely newer cellphone than Xperia Z3 Compact, although it's much heavier and thicker. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Xperia Z3 Compact has Android 4.4 version.
The Xperia Z3 Compact counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. Xperia Z3 Compact counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, a way worse 1280 x 720px resolution and a really smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Xperia Z3 Compact, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia Z3 Compact, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography in low-light environments and a more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Xperia Z3 Compact, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy XCover Pro is also cheaper than the Xperia Z3 Compact.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.