Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.37 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 score. The iPhone X is a newer cellphone than the Xperia Z3+, but it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. IPhone X features a display that's very similar to Sony Xperia Z3+'s screen, although the iPhone X also has a little larger screen, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone X has a much better hardware performance than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone X also has a 64 bits processor and more cpu cores. The iPhone X counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Sony Xperia Z3+ features a little longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 2930mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. The Sony Xperia Z3+ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia Z3+ also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a lot more MP camera.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Sony Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Sony Xperia Z3+. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Sony Xperia Z3+, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.