Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Xperia Z3+, with a general score of 81.9 against 73.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is incredibly newer than the Xperia Z3+, it is heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a better performing CPU than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia Z3+ features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little smaller screen and a bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch. The Sony Xperia Z3+ has slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
Xperia Z3+ features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a back camera with a way better 20.7 MP resolution and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Xperia Z3+ features just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xperia Z3+. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Xperia Z3+, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.