Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Xperia Z3+, having an 81.3 score against 73.7. LG V35 ThinQ's design is noticeably newer than Xperia Z3+'s, although it's a little thicker and just a bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 7 more cores.
The Xperia Z3+ has just a bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit smaller screen. Xperia Z3+ features a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a lot more than Xperia Z3+, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.