Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Sony Xperia Z3+, with an 81.2 score against 73.7. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, providing the user some extra features. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is notably newer than Sony Xperia Z3+, it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a superior processing unit than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). Xperia Z3+ has a little bit better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little bit smaller screen and a quite worse count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Xperia Z3+ features a little bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality pictures and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2930mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ is more expensive than the Sony Xperia Z3+, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.