Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Blue and White |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Sony Xperia Z3+, having an 87.6 score against 73.7. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is much newer than Sony Xperia Z3+, it is heavier and extremely thicker.
The Xperia Z3+ features a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each screen inch. LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Sony Xperia Z3+ has just a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much worse video quality, a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors and a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia Z3+, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.