Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is better than Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 global score. LG Velvet is a a lot newer cellphone than Xperia Z3+, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier. LG Velvet has a more powerful processing unit than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The Xperia Z3+ has a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
LG Velvet captures a little bit better videos and photos than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video, a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
LG Velvet features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2930mAh.
The LG Velvet costs a lot more than Sony Xperia Z3+, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.