Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-05-26 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force is a bit better than Xperia Z3+, getting a overall score of 75.8 against 73.7. Even though the Motorola Moto Z Force is newer than the Xperia Z3+, it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0.
Xperia Z3+ has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a bit lower screen density, a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen. The Moto Z Force has a little faster processing unit than Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 1 GB more RAM.
The Moto Z Force features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Xperia Z3+ has a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, a camera with a lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Moto Z Force counts with greater battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 19% greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Sony Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia Z3+. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Moto Z Force, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Sony Xperia Z3+, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.