Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than Xperia Z3+, getting an 80 score against 73.7. Motorola One Zoom is a noticeably newer device than Xperia Z3+, although it's way thicker and heavier. Sony Xperia Z3+ counts with a better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Motorola One Zoom has just a little better hardware performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Zoom captures much better pictures and videos than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a way more megapixels back camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola One Zoom features a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a 37 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia Z3+. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Xperia Z3+, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.