Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Xperia Z3+'s score of 73.7. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, counting with a lot of extra features. The nubia Red Magic 3S design is notably newer than Xperia Z3+'s, although it's way thicker and notably heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a faster processing unit than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Xperia Z3+ has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each screen inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better camera than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a larger camera aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z3+, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a really longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2930mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Sony Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Sony Xperia Z3+. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Sony Xperia Z3+, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.