Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is just a bit better than the Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 overall score. Galaxy A35 5G's construction is notably newer than Xperia Z3+'s, although it's much heavier and thicker. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version.
Xperia Z3+ features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser processing cores and lesser RAM memory. Xperia Z3+ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2930mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.