Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than the Xperia Z3+, getting a global score of 86.6 against 73.7. Galaxy A50s's design is noticeably newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than the Xperia Z3+. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has 10 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a quite better hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xperia Z3+ counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50s features a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than Sony Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better battery life than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.