Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Prism cube black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 overall score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy A51 5G is a noticeably newer device than Xperia Z3+, although it is heavier and a lot thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a faster CPU than Xperia Z3+, because it has 7 more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Xperia Z3+ has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much better storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G features a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way more expensive than the Xperia Z3+, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.