Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-05-26 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is way better than the Sony Xperia Z3+, getting a 90.7 score against 73.7. Although the Galaxy A52 is extremely newer than Sony Xperia Z3+, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xperia Z3+ has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels count in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z3+, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A52 counts with a better processor than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than Sony Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.