Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than Sony Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 global score. Galaxy A52 5G is a way newer cellphone than Sony Xperia Z3+, but it's thicker and noticeably heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version.
The Sony Xperia Z3+ counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior hardware performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a much higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2930mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.