Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Xperia Z3+, having a 91.1 score against 73.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, providing the user some nice extra features. Galaxy A52s's design is much newer, but thicker and heavier than the Xperia Z3+.
Galaxy A52s has a faster processor than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Xperia Z3+ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit better count of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A52s has a superior camera than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a superior battery lifetime than Xperia Z3+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.