Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the Xperia Z3+, with a global score of 76.9 against 73.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has a newer 10 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, giving you some nice extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy A70 is a way newer device than Xperia Z3+, but it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xperia Z3+ counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. The Galaxy A70 counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior CPU than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and 7 more cores. Sony Xperia Z3+ counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Sony Xperia Z3+ also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy A70 has a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 54% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia Z3+. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia Z3+, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.