Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Sony Xperia Z3+, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 73.7. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia Z3+, it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has a more recent 10 version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version, providing you some additional features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a superior processor than Xperia Z3+, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xperia Z3+ features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better camera than Xperia Z3+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much better resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much longer battery performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 54 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than Xperia Z3+, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.